<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>soumitra.net Blog &#187; Inspector Gadget</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soumitra.net/blog/index.php/archives/category/inspector-gadget/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soumitra.net/blog</link>
	<description>(!) just another weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 22:00:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why Increasing Pixels Counts</title>
		<link>http://soumitra.net/blog/archives/23</link>
		<comments>http://soumitra.net/blog/archives/23#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>soumitra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Inspector Gadget]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soumitra.net/blog/archives/23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are advantages to increasing the number of megapixels. Larger prints that require a minimum pixel count can be easier to make, and consumers can crop images to focus on just the subject matter they want.
But there are costs, too. Among the more obvious burdens: Camera image-processing chips have more data to digest; memory cards [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://soumitra.net/blog/archives/23/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.341 seconds -->

